4.3 Article

Comparison of aerial conidia and blastospores from two entomopathogenic fungi against Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) under laboratory and greenhouse conditions

Journal

BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 737-749

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2018.1487028

Keywords

Beauveria bassiana; Isaria fumosorosea; virulence; residue bioassay

Funding

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-IR4 project) [88085]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the insecticidal activity of liquid culture-produced blastospores and solid substrate-produced aerial conidia of Beauveria bassiana GHA and Isaria fumosorosea ARSEF3581 strains against Diaphorina citri adults. Insects exposed to 10(7) propagules/ml in a spray residue contact leaf bioassay died within 6 days at 25 degrees C, with no significant differences between fungal treatments. At higher concentrations (10(8) propagules/ml), I.fumosorosea conidia killed psyllids faster compared to its blastospore formulation, i.e. 4 versus 5 days, respectively. In greenhouse tests, the same treatments applied to infested citrus plants (2x10(6) spores/ml) all significantly reduced the number of nymphs compared with the untreated controls over 3 weeks; however, only I.fumosorosea blastospores significantly reduced the number of F1 adult psyllids when compared with controls. Similar results were observed in the follow-up greenhouse test, where I.fumosorosea blastospores were the most effective treatment overall, reducing D.citri populations by about 60% after 21 days; by contrast, imidacloprid killed almost 100% of psyllids within a week in both tests. Fewer psyllids exhibited mycosis in the greenhouse (i.e. approximate to 20 versus87% in the laboratory). This is the first report comparing both conidial and blastospore formulations of B.bassiana and I.fumosorosea for the control of a psyllid pest. Field testing is required to determine how successful different spore formulations might be under various environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available