4.7 Article

Dilepton rate and quark number susceptibility with the Gribov action

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.065004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Indian Department of Atomic Energy
  2. Kent State University Office of Research and Sponsored Programs
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0013470]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0013470] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use a recently obtained resummed quark propagator at finite temperature which takes into account both the chromoelectric scale gT and the chromomagnetic scale g(2)T through the Gribov action. The electric scale generates two massive modes whereas the magnetic scale produces a new massless spacelike mode in the medium. Moreover, the nonperturbative quark propagator is found to contain no discontinuity in contrast to the standard perturbative hard thermal loop approach. Using this nonperturbative quark propagator and vertices constructed using the Slavnov-Taylor identity, we compute the nonperturbative dilepton rate at vanishing three-momentum at one-loop order. The resulting rate has a rich structure at low energies due to the inclusion of the nonperturbative magnetic scale. We also calculate the quark number susceptibility, which is related to the conserved quark number density fluctuation in the deconfined state. Both the dilepton rate and quark number susceptibility are compared with results from lattice quantum chromodynamics and the standard hard thermal loop approach. Finally, we discuss how the absence of a discontinuity in the imaginary part of the nonperturbative quark propagator makes the results for both dilepton production and quark number susceptibility dramatically different from those in perturbative approaches and seemingly in conflict with known lattice data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available