4.5 Article

An update on minding the gap in cancer

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
Volume 1860, Issue 1, Pages 237-243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.06.015

Keywords

Cancer Gap junction; Connexin; Tumor progression; Cell migration; Invasion

Funding

  1. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine
  2. University of Poitiers
  3. STIM laboratory
  4. Ligue contre le Cancer
  5. Canadian Cancer Society [701459]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [123228, 102489, 93572]
  7. The Norwegian Cancer Society [709125]
  8. Research Council of Norway [179571]
  9. Metavivor Research and Support Inc
  10. VeloSano bike ride and National Institutes of Health [RO1 NS089641, R21 CA191263]
  11. US National Institutes of Health [GM55632]
  12. Institute de Salud Carlos III [PI13/00763, PI16/00772, CPII16/00042]
  13. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  14. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain [FEDER BFU2015-70040-R]
  15. Junta de Castilla y Leon, Spain [FEDER SA026U16]
  16. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  17. Canadian Cancer Society
  18. Canada Research Chairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article is a report of the International Colloquium on Gap junctions: 50 Years of Impact on Cancer that was held 8-9 September 2016, at the Amphitheater Pole Biologie Sante of the University of Poitiers (Poitiers, France). The colloquium was organized by M Mesnil (Universite de Poitiers, Poitiers, France) and C Naus (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada) to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the seminal work published in 1966 by Loewenstein and Kanno [Intercellular communication and the control of tissue growth: lack of communication between cancer cells, Nature, 116 (1966) 1248-1249] which initiated studies on the involvement of gap junctions in carcinogenesis. During the colloquium, 15 participants presented reviews or research updates in the field which are summarized below.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available