4.4 Article

Molecular Determinants of Substrate Specificity in Human Insulin-Degrading Enzyme

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 57, Issue 32, Pages 4903-4914

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00474

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences
  2. University Research Creativity Grant from Sacred Heart University
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1624774]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1624774] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) is a 110 kDa chambered zinc metalloendopeptidase that degrades insulin, amyloid beta, and other intermediate-sized aggregation prone peptides that adopt beta-structures. Structural studies of IDE in complex with multiple physiological substrates have suggested a role for hydrophobic and aromatic residues of the IDE active site in substrate binding and catalysis. Here, we examine functional requirements for conserved hydrophobic and aromatic IDE active site residues that are positioned within 4.5 angstrom of IDE-bound insulin B chain and amyloid beta peptides in the reported crystal structures for the respective enzyme-substrate complexes. Charge, size, hydrophobicity, aromaticity, and other functional group requirements for substrate binding IDE active site residues were examined through mutational analysis of the recombinant human enzyme and enzyme kinetic studies conducted using native and fluorogenic derivatives of human insulin and amyloid beta peptides. A functional requirement for IDE active site residues F115, A140, F141, Y150, W199, F202, F820, and Y831 was established, and specific contributions of residue charge, size, and hydrophobicity to substrate binding, specificity, and proteolysis were demonstrated. IDE mutant alleles that exhibited enhanced or diminished proteolytic activity toward insulin or amyloid beta peptides and derivative substrates were identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available