4.4 Article

Structure-Function Relationships in the Oligomeric NADPH-Dependent Assimilatory Sulfite Reductase

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 57, Issue 26, Pages 3764-3772

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00446

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB1149763]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The central step m the assimilation of sulfur is a six-electron reduction of sulfite to sulfide, catalyzed by the oxidoreductase NADPH-dependent assimilatory sulfite reductase (SiR). SiR is composed of two subunits. One is a multidomain flavin binding reductase (SiRFP) and the other an iron-containing oxidase (SiRHP). Both enzymes are primarily globular, as expected from their functions as redox enzymes. Consequently, we know a fair amount about their structures but not how they assemble. Curiously, both structures have conspicuous regions that are structurally undefined, leaving questions about their functions and raising the possibility that they are critical in forming the larger complex. Here, we used ultraviolet-visible and circular dichroism spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, proteolytic sensitivity tests, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and activity assays to explore the effect of altering specific amino acids in `` on their function in the holoenzyme complex. Additionally, we used computational analysis to predict the propensity for intrinsic disorder within both subunits and found that SiRHP's N-terminus is predicted to have properties associated with intrinsic disorder. Both proteins also contained internal regions with properties indicative of intrinsic disorder. We showed that SiRHP's N-terminal disordered region is critical for complex formation. Together with our analysis of SiRFP amino acid variants, we show how molecular interactions outside the core of each SiR globular enzyme drive complex assembly of this prototypical oxidoreductase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available