4.6 Article

An enhanced anti-tumor effect of apoptin-cecropin B on human hepatoma cells by using bacterial magnetic particle gene delivery system

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.108

Keywords

Bacterial magnetic particles; Gene therapy; Hepatocellular carcinoma

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gene therapy of cancer, due to the limit of its efficiency and safety, has not been widely used in clinical. Recently, bacterial magnetic particles (BMPs), which are membrane-bound nanocrystals found in magnetotactic bacteria, have been exploited as a new gene delivery system. However, its application on gene therapy remains to be explored. In our previous study, we found that a combination of cecropin B (ABPs) and apoptin (VP3) could serve as an effective gene therapeutic agent. Thus, in this study, we used BMPs to deliver the co-expression plasmid of these two gene, namely pVAX1-VA, and evaluated its therapeutic effect on human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2). Our results showed that BMPs significantly improved the efficiency of gene transfection (almost 3-fold than Lipofectamine 2000 at 48 h, P < .001), which led to stronger apoptosis (in a peak almost 2-fold than Lipofectamine 2000-pVAX1-VA, P < .01) and growth inhibition of HepG2 cells. More importantly, compared with Lipofectamine 2000-pVAX1-VA group, BMP-pVAX1-VA strikingly inhibited tumor growth (0.60 +/- 0.09 g vs. 0.88 +/- 0.11 g, P < .05) in nude mouse tumor models and increased the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes considerably without apparent cytotoxicity. These findings suggest that BMPs could be an attractive gene delivery system for gene therapy and provide a potential available treatment for human hepatocellular carcinoma and maybe some other kinds of tumors. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available