4.7 Review

Nanosized and hierarchical zeolites: A short review

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 447-467

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61038-5

Keywords

Zeolite; Nanozeolite; Hierarchical zeolite; Catalyst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zeolites are crystalline aluminosilicates with three-dimensional microporous structures. They have been used as ion-exchangers, catalysts, and adsorbents in various fields such as oil refining, petro-Accepted chemistry, agriculture, and water and wastewater treatment. Their wide use is because of their many beneficial properties, such as framework and compositional flexibilities, physical and hydro thermal stabilities, non-toxicity, high surface areas, exchangeable cations, and good cost-benefit ratios. Although many zeolite applications depend on their microporous structures, this can cause diffusional constraints for bulky reactant and product molecules. There have been many efforts to overcome the intrinsic limitations of conventional zeolites by preparing nanosized and hierarchically structured zeolites. As a result of these efforts, several strategies have been established and the use of new zeolitic materials in various catalytic and adsorptive reactions has been investigated. Longer lifetimes, high catalytic performances, and postponed coking and catalyst deactivation can be achieved using hierarchical and nanosized zeolites. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the enhanced properties of hierarchical and nanosized zeolites, and recent development methods for their synthesis. The advantages and disadvantages of each route are discussed, and the catalytic applications of nanozeolites and zeolites with secondary porosity, and a comparison with conventional zeolites, are briefly presented. (C) 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available