4.5 Review

On the design principles of peptide-drug conjugates for targeted drug delivery to the malignant tumor site

Journal

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 930-954

Publisher

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.80

Keywords

bioconjugates; cancer; drug delivery; PDC; peptide; peptide-drug conjugate; side-products in PDCs

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social Fund ESF)
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: ARISTEIA II [5199]
  3. National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary [NKFIH K119552]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer is the second leading cause of death affecting nearly one in two people, and the appearance of new cases is projected to rise by >70% by 2030. To effectively combat the menace of cancer, a variety of strategies have been exploited. Among them, the development of peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) is considered as an inextricable part of this armamentarium and is continuously explored as a viable approach to target malignant tumors. The general architecture of PDCs consists of three building blocks: the tumor-homing peptide, the cytotoxic agent and the biodegradable connecting linker. The aim of the current review is to provide a spherical perspective on the basic principles governing PDCs, as also the methodology to construct them. We aim to offer basic and integral knowledge on the rational design towards the construction of PDCs through analyzing each building block, as also to highlight the overall progress of this rapidly growing field. Therefore, we focus on several intriguing examples from the recent literature, including important PDCs that have progressed to phase III clinical trials. Last, we address possible difficulties that may emerge during the synthesis of PDCs, as also report ways to overcome them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available