4.6 Article

Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals improved association between brain networks and eating behaviors compared to static analysis

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 337, Issue -, Pages 114-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.001

Keywords

Behaviors of eating disorders; Dynamic connectivity analysis; Resting-state fMRI; Independent component analysis

Funding

  1. Institute for Basic Science [IBS-R015-D1]
  2. NRF (National Research Foundation of Korea) [NRF-2016H1A2A1907833, NRF-2016R1A2B4008545]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016H1A2A1907833] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uncontrollable eating behavior is highly associated with dysfunction in neurocognitive systems. We aimed to quantitatively link brain networks and eating behaviors based on dynamic functional connectivity analysis, which reflects temporal dynamics of brain networks. We used 62 resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data sets representing 31 healthy weight (HW) and 31 non-HW participants based on body mass index (BMI). Brain networks were defined using a data-driven group-independent component analysis and a dynamic connectivity analysis with a sliding window technique was applied. The network centrality parameters of the dynamic brain networks were extracted from each brain network and they were correlated to eating behavior and BMI scores. The network parameters of the executive control network showed a strong correlation with eating behavior and BMI scores only when a dynamic (p < 0.05), not static (p > 0.05), connectivity analysis was adopted. We demonstrated that dynamic connectivity analysis was more effective at linking brain networks and eating behaviors than static approach. We also confirmed that the executive control network was highly associated with eating behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available