4.4 Article

Entrepreneurial passions and identities in different contexts: a comparison between high-tech and social entrepreneurs

Journal

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 28, Issue 3-4, Pages 206-233

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1155743

Keywords

Entrepreneurial identities; entrepreneurial passion; self-concept; affect; high-tech entrepreneurs; social entrepreneurs

Funding

  1. Ariel University
  2. Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey
  3. Entrepreneurship Commercialisation and Innovation Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines entrepreneurial passion and components of entrepreneurial identity - sameness, otherness, and identity centrality and salience - in two different contexts, high-tech and social entrepreneurship. Based on life story interviews of 45 high-tech entrepreneurs (HTE) and social entrepreneurs (SEs), passion and identities are linked for each group but evolve differently. For HTEs, passion is composed of a strong challenge to lead a meaningful activity and to leave a fingerprint'. SE passion is characterized more in terms of enthusiasm and excitement and a desire to make a mark. HTEs' identities are central to their self-concept while SEs' identities can be more salient than central. SE identities are more synchronized than those of HTEs. For HTEs, otherness is dominant in their self-concept; however, they also maintain a concept of sameness. The findings of this study expand the literature by showing that passion is a dynamic motivational construct that is associated with entrepreneurs' self-concept of their role identities. The interrelations between entrepreneurial passion and self-concepts of role identities are perceived differently among entrepreneurs who operate in different contexts. In addition, this study also expands the literature on entrepreneurial identities and affect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available