4.7 Article

Linking radio-frequency identification to Building Information Modeling: Status quo, development trajectory and guidelines for practitioners

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 241-251

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.023

Keywords

Radio-frequency identification (RFID); Building information modeling (BIM); Linking RFID to BIM; Systematic review; Guidelines

Funding

  1. Innovation and Technology Commission [ITP/045/13LP]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR [17201717, 17205614]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global construction industry has witnessed the prolific development of radio-frequency identification (RFID), building information modeling (BIM), and most recently, linkage of the two. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to understanding the status quo and development trajectory of such RFID-enabled BIM systems. In view of the proliferation of existing RFID, BIM, and information linkage, practitioners would benefit from guidelines for choosing systems so that their construction engineering and management (CEM) needs can be better met. Accordingly, the study described in this paper has two interconnected research aims: (1) to identify current patterns and development trends in RFID-enabled BIM systems; and (2) to develop guidelines for choosing appropriate solutions for different CEM scenarios. A review of 42 actual cases published in scholarly papers reveals that RFID, used to identify objects and improve real-time information visibility and traceability, is now increasingly linked to BIM as a central information platform. This study provides practitioners with five-step guidelines for linking RFID to BIM for various CEM needs. It also provides researchers with a point of departure for further exploration of approaches to enhancing the value of RFID, BIM, and the integration of one with the other.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available