4.1 Article

Investigation of the effect of Equivac® HeV Hendra virus vaccination on Thoroughbred racing performance

Journal

AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages 132-141

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/avj.12679

Keywords

Hendra virus; racing performance; Thoroughbreds; Timeform rating; vaccination

Funding

  1. Queensland Racing Integrity Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of Equivac (R) HeV Hendra virus vaccine on Thoroughbred racing performance. DesignRetrospective pre-post intervention study. MethodsThoroughbreds with at least one start at one of six major south-eastern Queensland race tracks between 1 July 2012 and 31 December 2016 and with starts in the 3-month periods before and after Hendra virus vaccinations were identified. Piecewise linear mixed models compared the trends in Timeform rating' and margin to winner' before and after initial Hendra virus vaccination. Generalised linear mixed models similarly compared the odds of winning', placing' (1st-3rd) and winning any prize money'. Timeform rating trends were also compared before and after the second and subsequent vaccinations. ResultsAnalysis of data from 4208 race starts by 755 horses revealed no significant difference in performance in the 3months before versus 3months after initial Hendra vaccination for Timeform rating (P=0.32), Margin to winner' (P=0.45), prize money won (P=0.25), wins (P=0.64) or placings (P=0.77). Further analysis for Timeform rating for 7844 race starts by 928 horses failed to identify any significant change in Timeform rating trends before versus after the second and subsequent vaccinations (P=0.16) or any evidence of a cumulative effect for the number of vaccines received (P=0.22). ConclusionNo evidence of an effect of Hendra virus vaccination on racing performance was found. The findings allow owners, trainers, industry regulators and animal health authorities to make informed decisions about vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available