4.6 Review

Rigidity versus flexibility: the dilemma of understanding protein thermal stability

Journal

FEBS JOURNAL
Volume 282, Issue 20, Pages 3899-3917

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/febs.13343

Keywords

active site floppiness; computer simulation; conformational entropy; electrostatic interactions; enzyme activity; fluctuations; heat capacity; network theories; thermostability

Funding

  1. Bulgarian National Research Fund [DRG-02/05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of fluctuations in protein thermostability has recently received considerable attention. In the current literature a dualistic picture can be found: thermostability seems to be associated with enhanced rigidity of the protein scaffold in parallel with the reduction of flexible parts of the structure. In contradiction to such arguments it has been shown by experimental studies and computer simulation that thermal tolerance of a protein is not necessarily correlated with the suppression of internal fluctuations and mobility. Both concepts, rigidity and flexibility, are derived from mechanical engineering and represent temporally insensitive features describing static properties, neglecting that relative motion at certain time scales is possible in structurally stable regions of a protein. This suggests that a strict separation of rigid and flexible parts of a protein molecule does not describe the reality correctly. In this work the concepts of mobility/flexibility versus rigidity will be critically reconsidered by taking into account molecular dynamics calculations of heat capacity and conformational entropy, salt bridge networks, electrostatic interactions in folded and unfolded states, and the emerging picture of protein thermostability in view of recently developed network theories. Last, but not least, the influence ofhigh temperature on the active site and activity of enzymes will be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available