4.7 Article

High-resolution satellite remote sensing of provincial PM2.5 trends in China from 2001 to 2015

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 110-116

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.045

Keywords

PM2.5; Satellite remote sensing; High resolution; Long-term trend; Provincial scale

Funding

  1. NSFC/RGC Grant [N_HKUST631/05]
  2. Fok Ying Tung Graduate School [NRC06/07.SC01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the vast territory of China, the long-term PM2.5 trends may substantially differ among the provinces. In this study, we aim to assess the provincial PM2.5 trends in China during the past few Five-Year Plan (FYP) periods. The lack of long-term PM2.5 measurements, however, makes such assessment difficult. Satellite remote sensing of PM2.5 concentration is an important step toward filling this data gap. In this study, a PM2.5 data set was built over China at a resolution of 1 km from 2001 to 2015 using satellite remote sensing. Analyses show that the national average of PM2.5 concentration increased by 0.04 mu g.m(-3).yr(-1) during the 10th FYP period (2001-2005) and started to decline by -0.65 mu g.m(-3).yr(-1) and -2.33 mu g.m(-3).yr(-1) during the 11th (2006-2010) and the 12th (2011-2015) FYP period, respectively. In addition, substantial differences in the PM2.5 trends were observed among the provinces. Provinces in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region had the largest reduction of PM2.5 concentrations during the 10th and 12th FYP period. The greatest reduction rate of PM2.5 concentration during the 10th and 12th FYP period was observed in Beijing (-3.68 mu g.m(-3).yr(-1)) and Tianjin (-6.62 mu g.m(-3).yr(-1)), respectively. In contrast, PM2.5 concentrations remained steady for provinces in eastern and southeastern China (e.g., Shanghai) during the 12th FYP period. In overall, great efforts are still required to effectively reduce the PM2.5 concentrations in future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available