4.7 Article

Long-term trends in ozone in baseline and European regionally-polluted air at Mace Head, Ireland over a 30-year period

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 279-287

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.024

Keywords

Surface ozone; Trends; Baseline levels; Mace Head Ireland; Seasonal cycles

Funding

  1. Climate and Energy: Science and Analysis Division of the Department for Energy and Climate Change UK [EPG 1/1/130, EPG 1/1/142, CPEG 11, CPEG 24, CPEG 27, GA 01081, GA 0201, CESA 002]
  2. National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA) [NAGW-732, NAG1-1805, NAG5-3974, NAG-12099]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of surface ozone, O-3, have been made at the Mace Head Atmospheric Research Station on the North Atlantic Ocean coastline of Ireland over a 30-year period from April 1987 through to April 2017. Using meteorological analyses and a sophisticated Lagrangian dispersion model, the hourly observations have been sorted by air mass histories to separate out the observations for northern hemisphere mid-latitude baseline air masses. Monthly average baseline levels showed a pronounced seasonal cycle with spring maxima and summer minima. Baseline levels have shown an increase during the 1980s and 1990s which has been stronger in the winter and spring and weaker in the summer. The rate of this increase has slowed to the extent that baseline levels have been relatively constant through the 2000s and started to decline in 2010s. The unsorted O-3 data has shown different long-term trends from the baseline data because of the influence of European regional NOx and VOC emissions which have reduced wintertime O-3 levels below the baseline levels and enhanced summertime O-3 levels above them. Episodic peak O-3 levels have declined steadily during the study period but 50 ppb 1 h exceedances are likely to continue for the foreseeable future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available