4.6 Article

Detection of interstellar HCS and its metastable isomer HSC: new pieces in the puzzle of sulfur chemistry

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 611, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832743

Keywords

astrochemistry; line: identification; ISM: clouds; ISM: molecules; radio lines: ISM

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [610256: NANOCOSMOS]
  2. Spanish MINECO [AYA2016-75066-C2-1-P]
  3. Ramon y Cajal programme of Spanish MINECO [RyC-2014-16277]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first identification in interstellar space of the thioformyl radical (HCS) and its metastable isomer HSC. These species were detected toward the molecular cloud L483 through observations carried out with the IRAM 30m telescope in the lambda 3 mm band. We derive beam-averaged column densities of 7 x 10(12) cm(-2) for HCS and 1.8 x 10(11) cm(-2) for HSC, which translate into fractional abundances relative to H-2 of 2 x 10(-10) and 6 x 10(-12), respectively. Although the amount of sulfur locked by these radicals is low, their detection allows placing interesting constraints on the chemistry of sulfur in dark clouds. Interestingly, the H2CS/HCS abundance ratio is found to be quite low, similar to 1, in contrast with the oxygen analog case, in which the H2CO/HCO abundance ratio is around 10 in dark clouds. Moreover, the radical HCS is found to be more abundant than its oxygen analog, HCO. The metastable species HOC, the oxygen analog of HSC, has not yet been observed in space. These observational constraints are compared with the outcome of a recent model of the chemistry of sulfur in dark clouds. The model underestimates the fractional abundance of HCS by at least one order of magnitude, overestimates the H2CS/HCS abundance ratio, and does not provide an abundance prediction for the metastable isomer HSC. These observations should prompt a revision of the chemistry of sulfur in interstellar clouds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available