4.6 Article

Full exploration of the giant planet population around β Pictoris

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 612, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730436

Keywords

techniques: radial velocities; stars: individual: beta Pictoris; techniques: high angular resolution; planets and satellites: detection

Funding

  1. French CNRS
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE33-0018]
  3. OSUG LABEX
  4. French ANR [ANR-12-BS05-0012]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE33-0018, ANR-12-BS05-0012] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. The search for extrasolar planets has been limited so far to close orbit (typ. <= 5 au) planets around mature solar-type stars on the one hand, and to planets on wide orbits (>= 10 au) around young stars on the other hand. To get a better view of the full giant planet population, we have started a survey to search for giant planets around a sample of carefully selected young stars. Aims. This paper aims at exploring the giant planet population around one of our targets, beta Pictoris, over a wide range of separations. With a disk and a planet already known, the beta Pictoris system is indeed a very precious system for studies of planetary formation and evolution, as well as of planet-disk interactions. Methods. We analyse more than 2000 HARPS high-resolution spectra taken over 13 years as well as NaCo images recorded between 2003 and 2016. We combine these data to compute the detection probabilities of planets throughout the disk, from a fraction of au to a few dozen au. Results. We exclude the presence of planets more massive than 3 M-Jup closer than 1 au and further than 10 au, with a 90% probability. 15+ M(Jup )companions are excluded throughout the disk except between 3 and 5 au with a 90% probability. In this region, we exclude companions with masses larger than 18 (resp. 30) M-Jup with probabilities of 60 (resp. 90) %.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available