Journal
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 614, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731471
Keywords
stars: individual: CE Tau; stars: imaging; supergiants; stars: mass-loss; infrared: stars; techniques: interferometric
Categories
Funding
- European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [665501]
- Foundation Flanders (FWO) ([PEGASUS] 2 Marie Curie fellowship [12U2717N]
- Programme National de Physique Stellaire (PNPS) of CNRS/INSU, France
- NSF [1445935, 1616483]
- Division Of Astronomical Sciences
- Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1616483, 1445935] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Context. Red supergiant stars are one of the latest stages in the evolution of massive stars. Their photospheric convection may play an important role in the launching mechanism of their mass loss; however, its characteristics and dynamics are still poorly constrained. Aims. By observing red supergiant stars with near infrared interferometry at different epochs, we expect to reveal the evolution of bright convective features on their stellar surface. Methods. We observed the M2Iab-Ib red supergiant star CE Tau with the VLTI/PIONIER instrument in the H band at two different epochs separated by one month. Results. We derive the angular diameter of the star and basic stellar parameters, and reconstruct two reliable images of its H-band photosphere. The contrast of the convective pattern of the reconstructed images is 5 +/- 1% and 6 +/- 1% for our two epochs of observation. Conclusions. The stellar photosphere shows few changes between the two epochs. The contrast of the convective pattern is below the average contrast variations obtained on 30 randomly chosen snapshots of the best matching 3D radiative hydrodynamics simulation: 23 +/- 1% for the original simulation images and 16 +/- 1% for the maps degraded to the reconstruction resolution. We offer two hypotheses to explain this observation. CE Tau may be experiencing a quiet convective activity episode or it could be a consequence of its warmer effective temperature (hence its smaller radius) compared to the simulation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available