4.1 Article

Eye Movements in Risky Choice

Journal

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 29, Issue 2-3, Pages 116-136

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1854

Keywords

eye tracking; decision under risk

Funding

  1. University of Essex Research Promotion Fund
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K002201/1, ES/K004948/1]
  3. Leverhulme [RP2012-V-022]
  4. ESRC [ES/K004948/1, ES/K002201/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K002201/1, ES/K004948/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We asked participants to make simple risky choices while we recorded their eye movements. We built a complete statistical model of the eye movements and found very little systematic variation in eye movements over the time course of a choice or across the different choices. The only exceptions were finding more (of the same) eye movements when choice options were similar, and an emerging gaze bias in which people looked more at the gamble they ultimately chose. These findings are inconsistent with prospect theory, the priority heuristic, or decision field theory. However, the eye movements made during a choice have a large relationship with the final choice, and this is mostly independent from the contribution of the actual attribute values in the choice options. That is, eye movements tell us not just about the processing of attribute values but also are independently associated with choice. The pattern is simplepeople choose the gamble they look at more often, independently of the actual numbers they seeand this pattern is simpler than predicted by decision field theory, decision by sampling, and the parallel constraint satisfaction model. (c) 2015 The Authors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available