4.6 Article

Pain Neurophysiology Education and Therapeutic Exercise for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 338-347

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.016

Keywords

Exercise therapy; Low back pain; Neuroscience; Rehabilitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the effect of a pain neurophysiology education (PNE) program plus therapeutic exercise (TE) for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Design: Single-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: Private clinic and university. Participants: Patients with CLBP for >= 6 months (N=56). Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either a TE program consisting of motor control, stretching, and aerobic exercises (n=28) or the same TE program in addition to a PNE program (n=28), conducted in two 30- to 50-minute sessions in groups of 4 to 6 participants. Main Outcomes Measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity rated on the numerical pain rating scale which was completed immediately after treatment and at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were pressure pain threshold, finger-to-floor distance, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and Patient Global Impression of Change. Results: At 3-month follow-up, a large change in pain intensity (numerical pain rating scale: -2.2; -2.93 to -1.28; P<001; d=1.37) was observed for the PNE plus TE group, and a moderate effect size was observed for the secondary outcome measures. Conclusions: Combining PNE with TE resulted in significantly better results for participants with CLBP, with a large effect size, compared with TE alone. (C) 2017 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available