Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 in Melanocytic Lesions An Updated Review and Meta-analysis

Context.-Making an accurate diagnosis for melanocytic lesions has always been challenging for pathologists, especially when dealing with difficult-to-diagnose cases. Misdiagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic lesions in general has tremendous medical-legal implications, often leading to unnecessary and excessive use of adjunctive tests. Although molecular testing is of much interest and there is great support for its development, currently, for most melanocytic lesions, immunohistochemical studies remain the most practical method for assistance in the routine diagnosis of melanocytic lesions for the average pathologist. Objectives.-To review the practical use of p16 immunohistochemistry for evaluating melanocytic lesions, particularly for differentiating benign from malignant tumors, and to perform a meta-analysis of primary studies evaluating p16 immunohistochemistry in melanocytic lesions. Data Sources.-A PubMed database search for literature reporting melanocytic lesions and p16 immunohistochemistry was performed. Essential information from each study (number of samples, antibody used, collection dates, overall p16 immunohistochemistry results, and general method of interpretation) was tabulated and analyzed. Examples of representative cases showing p16 immuno-staining pattern are also illustrated. Conclusions.-Incorporation of p16 immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is of limited use, especially for the purpose of differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Evaluation of multiple studies reveals a wide range of results. However, there appears to be some value for the use of p16 in distinguishing nodal nevi from metastatic melanoma within nodes. The method of interpretation (nuclear versus cytoplasmic staining) also appears to give differing results, as studies considering only nuclear staining appeared to show more consistent results from study to study.