4.1 Article

BRICS banking and the debate over sub-imperialism

Journal

THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 611-629

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1128816

Keywords

economy and finance; South Africa; capitalism and centre-periphery; BRICS and rising powers

Funding

  1. Ford Foundation
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2013S1A5B8A01055117]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013S1A5B8A01055117] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Funded at $100 billion each, the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) and New Development Bank (NDB) represent 'sub-imperial' finance, insofar as, by all indications, they fit into - instead of providing alternatives to - the prevailing world systems of sovereign debt and project credits. Balance of payments constraints for BRICS members will not be relieved by the CRA, which requires an IMF intervention after just 30% of the quota is borrowed. In this context the NDB would appear close to the Bretton Woods Institution model, promoting frenetic extractivist calculations based on US dollar financing and hence more pressure to export.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available