4.5 Article

Non-peptide-based new class of platelet aggregation inhibitors: Design, synthesis, bioevaluation, SAR, and in silico studies

Journal

ARCHIV DER PHARMAZIE
Volume 351, Issue 3-4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ardp.201700349

Keywords

2-oxo-benzo[1,4]oxazine; cytotoxicity; in silico molecular docking; platelet aggregation inhibitors; structure-activity relationship

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2017R1C1B2003380]
  2. SERB, New Delhi for Fast Track Scheme [CS-037/2013]
  3. DST-RFBR Indo-Russian Joint Research Project [INT/RUS/RFBR/P-169]
  4. CSIR-EMR Grant, New Delhi [02 (0189)/14/EMR-II]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of 2-oxo-2-phenylethylidene linked 2-oxo-benzo[1,4]oxazine analogues 17a-x and 18a-o, incorporated with a variety of electron-withdrawing as well as electron-donating groups at ring A and ring C, were synthesized under greener conditions in excellent yields (up to 98%). These analogues 17a-x and 18a-o were evaluated for their arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation inhibitory activities in comparison with the standard reference aspirin (IC50=21.34 +/- 1.09 mu g/mL). Among all the screened compounds, eight analogues, 17i, 17x, 18f, 18g, 18h, 18i, 18l, and 18o, were identified as promising platelet aggregation inhibitors as compared to aspirin. In addition, cytotoxic studies in 3T(3) fibroblast cell lines by MTT assay of the promising compounds (17i, 17x, 18f-18i, 18l, and 18o) were also performed and the compounds were found to be non-toxic in nature. Furthermore, the results on the AA-induced platelet aggregation inhibitory activities of these compounds (17i, 17x, 18f-18i, 18l, and 18o) were validated via in silico molecular docking simulation studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the identification of non-peptide-based functionalized 2-oxo-benzo[1,4]oxazines as platelet aggregation inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available