4.7 Article

Cities and climate change mitigation: Economic opportunities and governance challenges in Asia

Journal

CITIES
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 11-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.010

Keywords

Climate; Carbon; Mitigation; Cities; Governance; Asia

Categories

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy [ES/K006576/1]
  2. UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office
  3. Government of India
  4. Government of Indonesia
  5. Government of Malaysia
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K006576/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. ESRC [ES/K006576/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cities are central to the fight against climate change, but the IPCC recently noted that many cities and particularly those in the developing world - lack the institutional, financial and technical capacities needed to switch to low emission development paths. Based on detailed case studies of three Asian cities, this paper finds that the adoption of low emission development strategies (LEDS) at the urban level could be economically attractive. However, it also argues that without a coordinated multi-level, cross-sectoral governance framework these opportunities for low carbon urban development are likely to be left unexploited. As these governance conditions are frequently not in place, we argue that these case study cities, and cities in similar contexts, are likely to miss even the economically attractive low carbon development opportunities and become increasingly locked in to higher cost, higher carbon development paths. Due to their growing size and importance, we conclude that the presence or absence of governance arrangements that enable the adoption of low carbon development strategies in Asian cities will have global implications for climate change. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available