4.2 Article

Diagnosis of depressed young people-criterion validity of WHO-5 and HSCL-6 in Denmark and Norway

Journal

FAMILY PRACTICE
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 359-363

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmv011

Keywords

Adolescent; brief psychiatric rating scale; depression; mass screening; primary health care; sensitivity and specificity

Funding

  1. Fund for Quality Assurance of Primary Health Care by the Norwegian Medical Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. According to the World Health Organization, depression ranks as a major contributor to the global burden of disease. A large proportion of adult depressions had their first appearance in adolescence. Brief and reliable rating scales are needed for early detection. Objective. The aim of this study is to validate the WHO-5 and the HSCL-6 for detection of depression among adolescents. Methods. The project is a GP multicentre study conducted in Denmark and Norway. A total of 294 adolescents (14-16 years) responded by answering a paper-or web-based questionnaire and later completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview, which was used as the gold standard. Depression was defined by ICD-10 criteria. Criterion validity was examined, the likelihood ratios measured and cut-offs for depression were calculated using the Youden index. Results. The prevalence of depression was 11.8% in our sample. The optimal cut-off point was 11 for the WHO-5 test and 9 for the HSCL-6 test. There were no gender differences. For the WHO-5 and the HSCL-6, respectively, the sensitivity was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.96] and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70-0.94), the specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84) and the likelihood ratio was 4.5 and 3.8 (P = 0.39). We observed no statistically significant diagnostic differences with respect to nationality or administration procedure. Conclusions. The WHO-5 and the HSCL-6 may both serve as valid case finding instruments for depression in young people in primary care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available