4.7 Article

South Korea's urban green energy strategies: Policy framework and local responses under the green growth

Journal

CITIES
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 20-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.011

Keywords

Energy transition; Low carbon green city; South Korea; Green growth; Renewable energy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea Grant - Korean Government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [특화전문대학원-02] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental and energy problems confronting South Korea brought a paradigm shift in the urban development toward low-carbon green city since the declaration of Green Growth Strategy in 2008. The South Korean governments set the goal to increase urban energy self-sufficiency through renewable energy generation and implemented various urban energy projects. However, the outcome of those urban green energy projects showed a varying degree of success. While the top-down approach led by the government facilitated the spread of urban green energy strategies in a short period of time, it also showed some drawbacks, such as the gap of willingness between the central government and the local governments and low level of community involvement. Although the importance of citizen participation in the transition to urban energy self-sufficiency has been emphasized in a rhetoric, energy projects that residents played a key role were rare in Korea. The urban energy transition in the low carbon green city projects needs to be supplemented by reinforced bottom-up approaches with the momentum from local governments as well as active citizen participation during the planning and implementation process. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available