4.7 Article

Non-uniform effect on the thermal/aging performance of Lithium-ion pouch battery

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages 1165-1174

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.090

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; Temperature distribution; Aging; Non-uniform; Performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51477171, 51607176]
  2. NSFC-RS (UK) [51611130199]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory Foundation of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development [Y607ji1001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-uniform distribution of current density and temperature is inevitable especially in high C-rate and it can lead to bad performance of battery. Therefore, the non-uniform effect (non-uniform temperature, current density and aging) on the pouch battery performance is studied with experiment and simulation. A new method, which measures the direct current resistance (DCR) based on the discharge curve, is proposed to get more detail of resistance variation. The measurement shows that the resistance of Lithium ion pouch battery with non-uniform temperature is similar to that of average temperature. Then, effect of non-uniform aging is simulated based on the electro-thermal coupled model. It is found that battery suffering non-uniform aging has smaller discharging capacity relatively. The main cause for the discharge capacity reduction between the uniform and non-uniform aging battery is the big difference of local stoichiometry of cathode electrode theta(LiFePO4). The capacity reduction in 1 C rate occupies about 6% of the permissible capacity loss. Finally, tabs of battery are changed in order to acquire uniform temperature distribution. Battery whose tabs are put on the middle of the top side and the bottom side has a better performance in the opinion of thermal analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available