4.7 Article

Combined QCD and electroweak analysis of HERA data

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.092002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN)
  2. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [05 H09PDF, 05h09GUF]
  3. HIR Grant from Universiti Malaya [UM.C/625/1/HIR/149]
  4. UMRG Grants from Universiti Malaya [RU006-2013, RP012A-13AFR, RP012B-13AFR]
  5. ERGS Grant from the Ministry of Education, Malaysia [ER004-2012A]
  6. National Science Centre, Poland [DEC-2012/06/M/ST2/00428]
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 676]
  9. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  10. RF Presidential Grant [3042.2014.2]
  11. Israel Science Foundation
  12. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  13. Polish National Science Centre [DEC-2011/01/B/ST2/03643, DEC-2011/03/B/ST2/00220]
  14. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000447/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. STFC [ST/N000447/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simultaneous fit of parton distribution functions (PDFs) and electroweak parameters to HERA data on deep inelastic scattering is presented. The input data are the neutral current and charged current inclusive cross sections which were previously used in the QCD analysis leading to the HERAPDF2.0 PDFs. In addition, the polarization of the electron beam was taken into account for the ZEUS data recorded between 2004 and 2007. Results on the vector and axial-vector couplings of the Z boson to u- and d-type quarks, on the value of the electroweak mixing angle and the mass of the W boson are presented. The values obtained for the electroweak parameters are in agreement with Standard Model predictions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available