4.7 Article

Biochar-supported reduced graphene oxide composite for adsorption and coadsorption of atrazine and lead ions

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 427, Issue -, Pages 147-155

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.237

Keywords

Lead ions; Atrazine; Reduced graphene oxide; Biochar composite; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Fund for Young Scholars [31600413]
  2. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [41625002]
  3. Agricultural Research Outstanding Talents and Innovation Team
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100222, 2015M581417]
  5. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund [LBH-TZ1603, LBH-Z15012]
  6. Young Talents Project of Northeast Agricultural University [16QC34]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To explore potential in application for simultaneous removal of atrazine and lead ions (Pd2+), the adsorption and coadsorption of atrazine and Pd2+ is evaluated onto a novel biochar-supported reduced graphene oxide composite (RGO-BC), which has been successfully developed via slow pyrolysis of graphene oxide (GO) pretreated corn straws. Structure and morphology analysis reveal that GO nanosheets are coated on the surface of biochar (BC) mainly through pi-pi interactions, notably, GO nanosheets after annealing reduction can basically retain the original morphology, meanwhile, the change of physico-chemical properties on the surface endow excellent adsorption capaities of 26.10 mg g(-1) for Pb2+ and 67.55 mg g(-1) for atrazine. A significant difference is in sorption of Pb2+ and atrazine on RGO-BC sample in both single- and binary-solute systems. The adsorption capacity of RGO-BC still remained above 54.58 mg g(-1) after four times regeneration (81% adsorption capacity remained), demonstrating a promising candidate for the application of removal contaminant in the environment. (C ) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available