4.7 Article

CD86+/CD206+, Diametrically Polarized Tumor-Associated Macrophages, Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Prognosis

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms17030320

Keywords

CD206; hepatocellular carcinoma; CD86; prognosis; tumor-associated macrophages; AFP

Funding

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [15410710100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81371268, 81100344, 81573423, 81572308, 81000968, 81172273]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), the most abundant infiltrating immune cells in tumor microenvironment, have distinct functions in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression. CD68(+) TAMs represent multiple polarized immune cells mainly containing CD86(+) antitumoral M1 macrophages and CD206(+) protumoral M2 macrophages. TAMs expression and density were assessed by immunohistochemical staining of CD68, CD86, and CD206 in tissue microarrays from 253 HCC patients. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic value of these markers were evaluated. We found that CD68(+) TAMs were not associated with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in HCC. Low presence of CD86(+) TAMs and high presence of CD206(+) TAMs were markedly correlated with aggressive tumor phenotypes, such as multiple tumor number and advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage; and were associated with poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.027 and p = 0.024, respectively) and increased time to recurrence (TTR) (p = 0.037 and p = 0.031, respectively). In addition, combined analysis of CD86 and CD206 provided a better indicator for OS (p = 0.011) and TTR (p = 0.024) in HCC than individual analysis of CD86 and CD206. Moreover, CD86(+)/CD206(+) TAMs predictive model also had significant prognosis value in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative patients (OS: p = 0.002, TTR: p = 0.005). Thus, these results suggest that combined analysis of immune biomarkers CD86 and CD206 could be a promising HCC prognostic biomarker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available