4.7 Article

Study on the surface sulfidization behavior of smithsonite at high temperature

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 437, Issue -, Pages 13-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.163

Keywords

Smithsonite; Zincite; Sulfidization roasting; Surface modification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604131, 51764024]
  2. Yunnan Province Applied Basic Research [2017FB084]
  3. Yunnan Province Collaborative Innovation Center Fund of Complex Nonferrous Metal Resources Comprehensive Utilization [KKPT201663011]
  4. Talent & Training Program of Yunnan Province [KKSY201563041]
  5. Testing and Analyzing Funds of Kunming University of Science and Technology [2016T20150055, 2016P2013101003, 2017T20090159]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface sulfidization behavior of smithsonite at high temperature was investigated by X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD) along with thermodynamic calculation, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The XRD and thermodynamic analyses indicated that the smithsonite was decomposed into zincite at high temperatures. After introducing a small amount of pyrite, artificial sulfides were formed at surface of the obtained zincite. The XPS analyses revealed that the sulfide species including zinc sulfide and zinc disulfide were generated at the zincite surface. The EPMA analyses demonstrated that the film of sulfides was unevenly distributed at the zincite surface. The average concentration of elemental sulfur at the sample surface increased with increasing of pyrite dosage. A suitable mole ratio of FeS2 to ZnCO3 for the surface thermal modification was determined to be about 0.3. These findings can provide theoretical support for improving the process during which the zinc recovery from refractory zinc oxide ores is achieved by xanthate flotation. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available