4.7 Article

Heteroatom-doped nanoporous carbon derived from MOF-5 for CO2 capture

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages 494-502

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.069

Keywords

MOF-5; Nanoporous carbon; CO2; Capture; Hydrogen-bonding interactions; Acid-base interactions; Electrostatic potential

Funding

  1. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAL04B02]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation China [21376274]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four nanoporous carbons (MUCT) were prepared from metal-organic framework (MOF-5) template and additional carbon source (i.e. urea) by carbonization at different temperatures (600-900 degrees C). The results showed that specific surface area of four samples was obtained in the range from 1030 to 2307 m(2) g(-1). By changing the carbonization temperature it can finely tune the pore volume of the MUCT, which having a uniform pore size of around 4.0 nm. With an increasing carbonization temperature, the micropore surface area of MUCT samples varied slightly, but mesopore surface area increased obviously, which had little influence on carbon dioxide (CO2) adsorption capacity. The as-obtained sample MUC900 exhibited the superior CO2 capture capacity of 3.7 mmol g(-1) at 0 degrees C (1 atm). First principle calculations were conducted on carbon models with various functional groups to distinguish heterogeneity and understand carbon surface chemistry for CO2 adsorption. The interaction between CO2 and N-containing functional groups is mainly weak Lewis acid-base interaction. On the other hand, the pyrrole and amine groups show exceptional hydrogen-bonding interaction. The hydroxyls promote the interaction between carbon dioxide and functional groups through hydrogen-bonding interactions and electrostatic potentials, thereby increasing CO2 capture of MUCT. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available