4.7 Article

Well-defined strategy for development of adsorbent using metal organic frameworks (MOF) template for high performance removal of hexavalent chromium

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 457, Issue -, Pages 1208-1217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.278

Keywords

Metal organic frameworks; MOF; Magnetic separation; Ferromagnetic adsorbent; Hexavalent chromium; Removal

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508451]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China [2018JQ5140]
  3. Students Scientific Research Training (SSRT) of XAUAT
  4. National Key Technology Support Program [2014BAC13B06]
  5. Science and technology overall plan of Shaanxi Province [2016KTCG01-17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A well-defined strategy for development of adsorbent with high performance using metal organic framework (MOF) as template is proposed. Porous (Fe0.72Fe2.28)-Fe-(0) C-(II) was further synthesized in accordance with the proposed strategy. The characteristics of (Fe0.72Fe2.28C)-Fe-(0)-C-(II) was evidenced by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis, which exhibited intriguing morphological structure and physicochemical properties. The unique ferromagnetic nature (90.7 emu g(-1)) confirmed its separability from aqueous solution. The obtained (Fe0.72Fe2.28C)-Fe-(0)-C-(II) was further applied for hexavalent chromium removal and exhibited desirable removal capability with a maximum capacity of 354.6 mg g(-1). The mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal on (Fe0.72Fe2.28C)-Fe-(0)-C-(II) was investigated, as well as its effect on pH, contact time, temperature, and water matrices. Findings from this study shed light on the rational design of adsorbent with high performance and expended the application of metal organic frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available