4.7 Article

WHICH Epeak? THE CHARACTERISTIC ENERGY OF GAMMA-RAY BURST SPECTRA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 821, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/12

Keywords

gamma-ray burst: general; methods: data analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A characteristic energy of individual gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra can in most cases be determined from the peak energy of the energy density spectra (F-nu(nu)), called E-peak. Distributions of E-peak have been compiled for time-resolved spectra from bright GRBs, as well as. time-averaged spectra and peak. flux spectra for nearly every burst observed by the Compton Gamma. Ray. Observatory. Burst And Transient Source Experiment and the Fermi. Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). Even when determined by an instrument with a broad energy band, such as GBM (8 keV to 40MeV), the distributions themselves peak at around 240 keV in the observer's frame, with a spread of roughly a decade in energy. E-peak can have considerable evolution (sometimes greater than one decade) within any given burst, as amply demonstrated by single pulses in GRB. 110721A and GRB. 130427A. Meanwhile, several luminosity or energy relations have been proposed to correlate with either the timeintegrated or peak. flux E-peak. Thus, when discussing correlations with E-peak, the question arises, Which E-peak?. A single burst may be characterized by any. of a number of values for E-peak that are associated with it. Using a single-pulse simulation model with spectral evolution as a proxy for the type of spectral evolution observed in many bursts, we investigate how the time-averaged E-peak emerges from the spectral evolution within a single pulse, how this average naturally correlates with the peak. flux. derived Epeak in a burst, and how the distribution in E-peak values from many bursts derives its surprisingly narrow width.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available