4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 691-705

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.011

Keywords

Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs); Probability-hesitant fuzzy sets; Consistency; Consensus; Ideal individual

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671118, 71301110, 71501137, 71601134]
  2. International Visiting Program for Excellent Young Scholars of Sichuan University
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [skqy201525]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A consensus reaching process is an iteratively developed negotiation process designed to ensure that a mutual agreement is reached by decision makers. To incorporate distribution information of hesitant fuzzy sets, probability-hesitant fuzzy sets have recently been proposed. In the context of probability hesitant fuzzy preference relations (PHFPR), this paper aims to provide a novel consensus reaching process for group decision making problems. By means of fuzzy preference relations, an optimization based consistency improvement process is proposed to deal with the inconsistencies in a given PHFPR. Consensus measures that are developed based on the distances between the individuals are computed on three levels: an alternative pair level, an alternatives level, and a preference relations level. An algorithm that adopts a local feedback strategy is designed to improve the consensus reaching process. The feedback strategy sequentially identifies the preferences with respect to the position and the anti-ideal individuals who need to change, after which the convergence of the proposed algorithm is proven. The novelty of the proposed strategy is that it avoids the need to compute the collective preference relations and recommendations are generated for the individuals in their original domains. Finally, some numerical examples taken from the literature are given to compare the proposed approaches with existing studies. The obtained results confirm the theoretical analysis and highlight the advantages of the proposed approaches. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available