4.7 Article

Screening alternatives considering different evaluation index sets: A method based on soft set theory

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 614-626

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.037

Keywords

Screening alternatives; Evaluation index set; Soft set; A-Product operator; Uni-int operator

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71571039, 71271049, 71471032, 71771043]
  2. 111 Project [B16009]
  3. Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [14YJC630063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates a new screening alternative problem in which evaluation index sets and index requirements provided by multiple departments are different. To solve the problem, screening alternative method based on the soft set theory is proposed. Taking the screening alternative problem with two departments as a case, the three rules of screening alternatives and the calculation process of screening alternatives are given. In the proposed method, the soft set on the index requirements and the alternatives that reach the index requirements for each department is first constructed. Then, evaluation index subsets concerning the acceptable level and the satisfactory level provided by each department are set up, respectively. Further, the soft sets concerning the acceptable levels and the satisfactory levels are constructed based on the evaluation index subsets. Afterwards, according to a selected screening alternative rule, the constructed soft sets are integrated using the A-products and the uni-int operators to obtain the screening alternative set satisfying the rule. In addition, the screening alternatives processes considering multiple departments and the different importance of indexes are also given, respectively. Finally, an example is used to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available