4.6 Article

Influence of impurities on the high temperature conductivity of SrTiO3

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5000363

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AFOSR [BRI: FA9550-14-1-0264]
  2. National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In studies of high temperature electrical conductivity (HiTEC) of dielectrics, the impurity in the highest concentration is assumed to form a single defect that controls HiTEC. However, carrier concentrations are typically at or below the level of background impurities, and all impurities may complex with native defects. Canonical defect models ignore complex formation and lump defects from multiple impurities into a single effective defect to reduce the number of associated reactions. To evaluate the importance of background impurities and defect complexes on HiTEC, a grand canonical defect model was developed with input from density functional theory calculations using hybrid exchange correlation functionals. The influence of common background impurities and first nearest neighbor complexes with oxygen vacancies (vO) was studied for three doping cases: nominally undoped, donor doped, and acceptor doped SrTiO3. In each case, conductivity depended on the ensemble of impurity defects simulated with the extent of the dependence governed by the character of the dominant impurity and its tendency to complex with vO. Agreement between simulated and measured conductivity profiles as a function of temperature and oxygen partial pressure improved significantly when background impurities were included in the nominally undoped case. Effects of the impurities simulated were reduced in the Nb and Al doped cases as both elements did not form complexes and were present in concentrations well exceeding all other active impurities. The influence of individual impurities on HiTEC in SrTiO3 was isolated and discussed and motivates further experiments on singly doped SrTiO3. (C) 2018 Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available