4.7 Article

Isolation and characterization of a heterologously expressed bacterial laccase from the anaerobe Geobacter metallireducens

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 2425-2439

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8785-z

Keywords

Bacterial laccase; Characterization; Bioinformatics; Heterologous expression; Anaerobic microorganisms

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P4-0116, J4-4250]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioinformatics has revealed the presence of putative laccase genes in diverse bacteria, including extremophiles, autotrophs, and, interestingly, anaerobes. Integrity of laccase genes in anaerobes has been questioned, since laccases oxidize a variety of compounds using molecular oxygen as the electron acceptor. The genome of the anaerobe Geobacter metallireducens GS-15 contains five genes for laccase-like multicopper oxidases. In order to show whether one of the predicted genes encodes a functional laccase, the protein encoded by GMET_RS10855 was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli cells. The His(6)-tagged enzyme (named GeoLacc) was purified to a large extent in the apoprotein, inactive form: incubation with CuSO4 allowed a 43-fold increase of the specific activity yielding a metallo-enzyme. The purified enzyme oxidized some of the typical laccase substrates, including 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), syringaldazine, and 2,6-dimethoxyphenol (2,6-DMP), along with pyrogallol and K-4[Fe(CN)(6)]. Temperature optimum was 75 A degrees C and pH optimum for ABTS and 2,6-DMP oxidation was similar to 6.0. As observed for other laccases, the enzyme was inhibited by halide anions and was sensitive to increasing concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide and Tween-80. Notably, GeoLacc possesses a very high affinity for dioxygen: a similar activity was measured performing the reaction at air-saturated or microaerophilic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available