4.5 Article

Magnesium and calcium silicate hydrates, Part I: Investigation of the possible magnesium incorporation in calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and of the calcium in magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H)

Journal

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 229-242

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.12.005

Keywords

Low-pH cement; Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H); Magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H); Surface properties; Thermodynamic modelling

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [206021_150638/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and magnesium silicate hydrate (M-S-H) have been described as two separate phases. This work investigates their stability domains and the possible uptake of small amounts of magnesium by C-S-H or, reversely, the uptake of small amounts of calcium by M-S-H. The phases, synthesized by co-precipitation, are characterized using a large panel of techniques (thermogravimetry analysis, X-ray diffraction, Xray pair distribution function analysis, Si-29 MAS-NMR spectroscopy, measurement of zeta potential and cation exchange capacity) while the compositions of the solutions at equilibrium are determined by ion chromatography and pH measurements. Syntheses of C-S-H samples in the presence of magnesium ((Ca + Mg)/Si = 0.80 and Mg/Si = 0.05 or 0.10) yield two separate phases: C-S-H and M-S-H. There is no experimental evidence of any uptake of magnesium by C-S-H. On the contrary, when M-S-H samples are synthesized in the presence of calcium ((Ca + Mg)/Si = 0.80 and Ca/Si = 0.05 or 0.10), the low pH of the suspension (9-10) prevents the formation of C-S-H but favors the precipitation of M-S-H with small amounts of calcium. This latter may be sorbed onto the surface of M-S-H to outbalance its negative charges and/or incorporated into the interlayer, as suggested by small structural changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available