Journal
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 165-183Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0001839216629644
Keywords
editors; editorial policies; reviewing; statistical analyses; hypotheses; empirical findings
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This essay proposes ways to improve editorial evaluations of manuscripts and to make published research more reliable and trustworthy. It points to troublesome properties of current editorial practices and suggests that editorial evaluations could become more reliable by making more allowance for reviewers' human limitations. The essay also identifies some troublesome properties of prevalent methodology, such as statistical significance tests, HARKing, and p-Hacking, and proposes editorial policies to mitigate these detrimental behaviors.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available