4.8 Article

Power-to-Gas: Electrolyzers as an alternative to network expansion - An example from a distribution system operator

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages 182-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.117

Keywords

Power-to-gas; Distribution grid; Electrolyzer; Network expansion; Hydrogen; Electrical grid

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association under the Joint Initiative EnergySystem 2050 - A Contribution of the Research Field Energy
  2. Westnetz GmbH
  3. JARA Energy (Julich-Aachen Research Alliance Energy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high share of fluctuating renewable energy sources (FRES) such as wind and photovoltaic (PV) necessitates the need for controllable generation, storage devices or adjustable consumption, due to the surplus arising from installed capacity that exceeds the conventional electrical load. The use of this surplus to produce hydrogen and oxygen via electrolysis is called Power-to-Gas (P2G). This study investigates the potential use of electrolyzers in the electrical distribution grid as an alternative to a network expansion with cables. For this purpose, an existing distribution grid was modelled and the possible size of an electrolyzer investigated so as to achieve the same effect as with an electrical cable in terms of, for example, the voltage level. The investment cost of both possibilities was compared and the hydrogen production costs analyzed. The results show that laying a cable is currently a more cost-effective option in comparison to an electrolyzer, costing around 30% of the overall investment required for the electrolyzer. The remaining 70% of the electrolyzer cost needs to be met by other means, for example by selling the hydrogen produced. However, profitability is highly dependent on the surplus in the grid and thus the full load hours of the electrolyzer. Furthermore, the results obtained cannot be generalized, since they are highly influenced by the scenario used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available