4.4 Article

Sleep-deprived motor vehicle operators are unfit to drive: a multidisciplinary expert consensus statement on drowsy driving

Journal

SLEEP HEALTH
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 94-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.04.003

Keywords

Drowsy driving; Sleepiness; Fatigue; Sleep deficiency; Sleep need; Definition; Impaired driving; Circadian; Crash; Accident

Funding

  1. Amazon.com, Inc
  2. A2Z Development Center, Inc
  3. Bose Corporation
  4. Boston Celtics: Boston Red Sox
  5. Cleveland Browns
  6. Institute of Digital Media and Child Development
  7. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  8. Merck Sharpe and Dohme
  9. Purdue Pharm
  10. Quest Diagnostics
  11. Samsung Electronics
  12. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  13. Koninklijke Philips Electronics
  14. Novartis
  15. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  16. Cephalon, Inc
  17. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  18. Mary Ann and Stanley Snider through Combined Jewish Philanthropies
  19. National Football League Charities
  20. Optum
  21. ResMed
  22. Philips Respironics
  23. San Francisco Bar Pilots
  24. Simmons
  25. Schneider, Inc
  26. Sysco
  27. Vanda Pharmaceuticals
  28. Harvard School of Public Health
  29. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Sleep Foundation
  30. New England College of Optometry
  31. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  32. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd
  33. Sanofi-Aventis, Inc
  34. Sepracor, Inc
  35. Wake Up Narcolepsy
  36. Optalert
  37. Compumedics
  38. Philips Lighting
  39. Tyco Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This article presents the consensus findings of the National Sleep Foundation Drowsy Driving Consensus Working Group, which was an expert panel assembled to establish a consensus statement regarding sleep-related driving impairment. Methods: The National Sleep Foundation assembled a expert panel comprised of experts from the sleep community and experts appointed by stakeholder organizations. A systematic literature review identified 346 studies that were abstracted and provided to the panelists for review. A modified Delphi RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 2 rounds of voting was used to reach consensus. Results: A final consensus was reached that sleep deprivation renders motorists unfit to drive a motor vehicle. After reviewing growing evidence of impairment and increased crash risk among drivers who obtained less than optimal sleep duration in the preceding 24 hours, the panelists recognized the need for public policy guidance as to when it is certainly unsafe to drive. Toward this end, the panelists agreed upon the following expert consensus statement: Drivers who have slept for two hours or less in the preceding 24 hours are not fit to operate a motor vehicle. Panelists further agreed that most healthy drivers would likely be impaired with only 3 to 5 hours of sleep during the prior 24 hours. Conclusions: There is consensus among experts that healthy individuals who have slept for 2 hours or less in the preceding 24 hours are too impaired to safely operate a motor vehicle. Prevention of drowsy driving will require sustained and collaborative effort from multiple stakeholders. Implications and limitations of the consensus recommendations are discussed. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of National Sleep Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available