4.8 Article

A feasible way to handle the heat management of direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 881-890

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.039

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell; Carbon gasification; Vacuum thermionic generator; Heat management; Performance improvement

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406091]
  2. Research Grant Council, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong SAR [PolyU 152127/14E]
  3. Environment and Conservation Fund, Hong Kong SAR [ECF 54/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel integrated system consisting of an external heat source, a direct carbon solid oxide fuel cell (DC-SOFC), a vacuum thermionic generator (VTIG) and a regenerator is proposed to handle the heat management of the DC-SOFC. The electrochemical/chemical reactions, ionic/electronic charge transport, mass/momentum transport and heat transfer are fully considered in the 2D tubular DC-SOFC model, which shows that the overall heat released in the cell is always different from the heat required by the internal Boudouard reaction. Three different operation strategies of the proposed system are presented, and accordingly, analytical expressions for the overall power output and efficiency for the proposed system are specified. The results show that the VTIG could effectively recover the waste heat for additional power production at a large operating current density, and the maximum power density and efficiency of the proposed system could reach more than 8100 W m(-2) and 60% at 30,000 A m(-2) and 1173 K, respectively. The effects of the operating current density, the operating temperature and the distance between the carbon layer and anode of the DC-SOFC, and the size, anode temperature and work function of the VTIG on the performance of the proposed system are discussed through comprehensive parametric studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available