4.7 Article

Comparison of chitosan with different physical forms to remove Reactive Black 5 from aqueous solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 2259-2267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2016.04.003

Keywords

Adsorption; Chitosan films; Chitosan powder; Reactive Black 5

Funding

  1. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  2. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have demonstrated that the chitosan powder (CP) and chitosan films (CF) are attractive alternatives to remove dyes from aqueous solutions, but powder and films were evaluated separately. In this work, CP and CF are compared as adsorbents to remove Reactive Black 5 (RB5), which is a hazardous dye of textile effluents. Chitosan samples were produced with different deacetylation degrees (from 65% to 95%). Adsorption isotherms and kinetics were studied at various values of pH, temperature, stirring rate and deacetylation degree. Adsorption-desorption cycles were performed. CP and CF with deacetylation degree of 95% were the best adsorbents, removing more than 99% of RB5, in pH 4.0 at 298 K. The Langmuir model was the more suitable to fit of the equilibrium data for both adsorbents (R-2 >= 0.9852 and ARE <= 1.93), and CP showed an adsorption capacity slightly higher. The adsorption kinetics of RB5 onto both adsorbents was better represented by the Elovich model (R-2 >= 0.9990 and ARE <= 5.21). The interactions analyses indicated that electrostatic interactions occurred between the adsorbents and RB5. CF were easily separated from the liquid phase during the adsorption-desorption cycles and were reused three times, while CP cannot be reused. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available