4.1 Article

Sustained antiviral effects and clearance of hepatitis surface antigen after combination therapy with entecavir and pegylated interferon in chronic hepatitis B

Journal

ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 513-521

Publisher

INT MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.3851/IMP3225

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although the efficacy of combination therapy with lamivudine or tenofovir and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) has been reported in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the long-term effect of the combination based on the observation of clinical course remains to be clarified. We previously reported the efficacy of combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and PEG-IFN. Here, we investigated the long-term effect of this combination in patients with CHB. Methods: We administered both ETV and PEG-IFN-alpha 2a or -2b simultaneously to 26 patients with HBV genotype C infection. Treatment was continued for 48 weeks followed by 24 weeks of observation period; we examined the virological and biochemical responses. We also analysed characteristics related to the post-treatment relapse. Finally, we investigated the long-term therapeutic effects. Results: Average reduction of intra-hepatic cccDNA level was 1.2 log copies/mu g at the completion of administration. Pretreatment hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level with more than 3.5 log U/ml was identified as a predictive factor for relapse. Furthermore, the cumulative rates of HBsAg-negative patients at 1, 3 and 5 years after the completion of administration were 3.8, 8.4 and 15%, respectively (mean follow-up period: 4.8 years). Conclusions: Baseline HBsAg level with more than 3.5 log U/ml is a useful predictor for relapse 24 weeks after the completion of administration in patients treated with combination therapy. Combination with EN and PEG-IFN could be an option for treatment of CHB patients especially in those with baseline HBsAg levels of less than 3.5 log U/ml.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available