4.7 Article

Disulfiram can inhibit MERS and SARS coronavirus papain-like proteases via different modes

Journal

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 155-163

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.12.015

Keywords

MERS- and SARS-CoV; Papain-like protease; Disulfiram; 6-Thioguanine; Mycophenolic acid; Synergistic inhibition

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC [104-2320-B-010-034, 105-2320-B-010-012, 106-2320-B-010-013]
  2. CGMH-NYMU joint research grant [CMRPG2F0431]
  3. National Core Facility Program for Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) emerged in southern China in late 2002 and caused a global outbreak with a fatality rate around 10% in 2003. Ten years later, a second highly pathogenic human CoV, MERS-CoV, emerged in the Middle East and has spread to other countries in Europe, North Africa, North America and Asia. As of November 2017, MERS-CoV had infected at least 2102 people with a fatality rate of about 35% globally, and hence there is an urgent need to identify antiviral drugs that are active against MERS-CoV. Here we show that a clinically available alcohol-aversive drug, disulfiram, can inhibit the papain-like proteases (PL(pro)s) of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV. Our findings suggest that disulfiram acts as an allosteric inhibitor of MERS-CoV PLpro but as a competitive (or mixed) inhibitor of SARS-CoV PLpro. The phenomenon of slow-binding inhibition and the irrecoverability of enzyme activity after removing unbound disulfiram indicate covalent inactivation of SARS-CoV PLpro by disulfiram, while synergistic inhibition of MERS-CoV PLpro by disulfiram and 6-thioguanine or mycophenolic acid implies the potential for combination treatments using these three clinically available drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available