4.3 Article

Purification, characterization and physiological significance of a chitinase from the pilei of Coprinopsis cinerea fruiting bodies

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 363, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw120

Keywords

chitinase; cell wall; pileus; autolysis; fruiting body

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570046]
  2. Priority Academic Development Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We purified a chitinase from pilei extractions of Coprinopsis cinerea fruiting bodies by ammonium sulfate precipitation and CM Sepharose cation exchange chromatography. MALDI-TOF/TOF MS analysis characterized this purified chitinase as a putative class V chitinase, ChiB1. ChiB1 hydrolyzed colloidal chitin and chitosan, whereas it did not hydrolyze chitin powder. ChiB1 cleaved only pNP-(GlcNAc)(2), rather than pNP-GlcNAc or pNP-(Glc-NAc)(3), to release nitrophenol. ChiB1 preferably and progressively released (GlcNAc)(2) from (GlcNAc) 6 and digested (GlcNAc)6 to two molecules of (GlcNAc)3 in a small proportion, but did not split (GlcNAc)(2), so it is an exochitinase. ChiB1 has an optimum temperature range of 35 degrees C to 40 degrees C and an optimum pH of 5.0. ChiB1 exhibited Km and Vmax values of 2.63 mg ml(-1) and 2.31 mu mol min(-1) mg protein(-1) for colloidal chitin, respectively. The ChiB1 gene, along with another putative endochitinase (class III chitinase gene), was expressed dominantly among eight predicted chitinase genes in the genome, and its expression level increased with the maturation of fruiting bodies. ChiB1 incubation released a large amount of soluble beta-glucan fractions from alkali-insoluble cell wall fractions of C. cinerea fruiting bodies, thereby it may promote the degradation of cell walls in synergy with the beta-1,3-glucanases during pileus autolysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available