4.3 Article

Quantitative Structure-Cytotoxicity Relationship of 2-(N-cyclicamino)chromone Derivatives

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 3897-3906

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12674

Keywords

2-(N-Cyclicamino)chromones; QSAR analysis; cytotoxicity; tumor selectivity; molecular shape

Categories

Funding

  1. KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [15K08111, 16K11519]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aim: 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-ones (chromones) have provided backbone structure for the chemical synthesis of potent anticancer drugs. In this study, the cytotoxicity of fifteen 2-(N-cyclicamino)chromone derivatives was investigated and subjected to quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis. Materials and Methods: Cytotoxicity against four human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and three oral normal mesenchymal cells was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. Tumor specificity (TS) was evaluated by ratio of mean 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) against normal oral cells to that against human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Potency-selectivity expression (PSE) value was calculated by dividing the TS value by CC50 against tumor cells. Apoptosis induction was evaluated by morphological observation, western blot analysis and cell- cycle analysis. For QSAR analysis, a total of 3,089 physicochemicals, structural and quantum chemical features were calculated from the most stabilized structure optimized using Gonna. Results: 7-Methoxy-2-(4-morpholinyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (5c) showed highest tumor-specificity, comparable with that of doxorubicin, without inducing apoptosis. Tumor-specificity of fifteen 2-(N-cyclicamino) chromones was correlated with molecular shape, especially 3D-structure. Conclusion: Chemical modification of 5c may be a potential choice for designing a new type of anticancer drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available