4.6 Article

Relativistic coupled-cluster calculation of the electron-nucleus scalar-pseudoscalar interaction constant Ws in YbF

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042507

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) program from the Japan Science and Technology (JST) Agency
  2. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [25810007]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25810007] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scalar-pseudoscalar (S-PS) interaction, which has been predicted between the electrons and nuclei of atoms and molecules, violates parity-(P-) and time-(T-) reversal symmetries. The electric dipole moment of the electron (eEDM) and the S-PS interaction together give rise to an energy shift in paramagnetic polar molecules, which in principle can be measured. The determination of the S-PS interaction constant, k(s),(A), for an atom A could be a sensitive probe of physics beyond the standard model. The upper limit for it can be obtained by combining the results of the measured energy shift mentioned above and the accurate quantum chemical calculation of the S-PS coefficient, W-s,(A). In this work, we use a method based on the four-component relativistic coupled-cluster singles and doubles (RCCSD) method to calculate this coefficient for YbF, one of the most promising candidates for the search of the eEDM and the S-PS interaction. We obtain W-s,W-Yb = -40.5 (kHz) with an estimated error of less than 10% for YbF. We also calculate the effective electric field (E-eff), the molecular dipole moment, and the parallel component of the hyperfine coupling constant (A(vertical bar vertical bar)) by the RCCSD method. The discrepancies in the results of these calculations with those of accurate measurements are used to estimate the accuracy of our calculation of W-s,W-Yb.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available