4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Durability of Aortic Valve Cusp Repair With and Without Annular Support

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 739-748

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.09.019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gus P. Karos Registry Fund
  2. Reiman Foundation
  3. David Whitmire Hearst, Jr. Foundation
  4. Anderson Family Foundation
  5. Judith Dion Pyle Endowed Chair in Heart Valve Research
  6. John and Rosemary Brown Endowed Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine
  7. Peter and Elizabeth C. Tower and Family Endowed Chair in Cardiothoracic Research
  8. Drs Sidney and Becca Fleischer Heart and Vascular Education Chair
  9. Edwards Lifesciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. To determine the value of aortic valve repair rather than replacement for valve dysfunction, we assessed late outcomes of various repair techniques in the contemporary era. Methods. From January 2001 to January 2011, aortic valve repair was planned in 1,124 patients. Techniques involved commissural figure-of-8 suspension sutures (n = 63 [6.2%]), cusp repair with commissuroplasty (n = 481 [48%]), debridement (n = 174 [17%]), free-margin plication (n = 271 [27%]) or resection (n = 75) or both, or annulus repair with resuspension (n = 230 [23%]), root reimplantation (n = 252 [25%]), or remodeling (n = 35 [3.5%]). Results. Planned repair was aborted for replacement in 115 patients (10%); risk factors included greater severity of aortic regurgitation (AR; p = 0.0002) and valve calcification (p < 0.0001). In-hospital outcomes for the remaining 1,009 patients included death (12 [1.2%]), stroke (13 [1.3%]), and reoperation for valve dysfunction (14 [1.4%]). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97%, 93%, and 90%, respectively. Figure-of-8 suspension sutures, valve resuspension, and root repair and replacement were least likely to require reoperation; cusp repair with commissural sutures, plication, and commissuroplasty was most likely (p < 0.05). Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96%, 92%, and 83%. Immediate postoperative AR grade was none-mild (94%), moderate (5%), and severe (1%). At 10 years after repair, AR grade was none (20%), mild (33%), moderate (26%), and severe (21%). Patients undergoing root procedures were less likely to have higher-grade postoperative AR (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Valve repair is effective and durable for treating aortic valve dysfunction. Greater severity of AR preoperatively is associated with higher likelihood of repair failure. Commissural figure-of-8 suspension sutures and repair with annular support have the best longterm durability. (C) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available